laptop core i5 8350u

Dell Latitude 7390 2-in-1 Laptop, 13.3" FHD WVA (1920 X 1080) Touchscreen, Intel Core i5-8350U, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Windows 10 Pro (Renewed) Dell Latitude 7390 Touchscreen Laptop, 13.3-inch FHD Touch Display, Intel Core i7-8650U Upto 3.6GHz, 16GB RAM, 256GB SSD, DisplayPort via USB-C, HDMI, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Windows 10 Pro (Renewed) Lenovo ThinkPad X240 Intel Core i5 4th Gen. PC Laptops & Netbooks 256 GB SSD Capacity, Lenovo 15.6" ThinkPad T580 Intel 1.70GHz CORE i5 [8350U] 32GB 256GB SSD WIN10P. Pre-owned Pre-owned. C $554.93 + C $51.98 shipping + C $51.98 shipping. Seller 100% positive Seller 100% positive. Microsoft Surface Laptop 2 - 13.5" - Core i5 8350U - 8 GB RAM - 256 GB SSD Operating System Win 10 Pro Processor Generation Intel Core 8th Gen Battery Up to 14.5 hours Model Microsoft Surface Laptop 2 Storage 256 GB SSD Keyboard Backlight Yes Dimensions (WxDxH) 30.81 cm x 22.327 cm x 1.448 cm Colour Platinum Processor Core i5 8350U / RAM 8GB / SSD 256GB / 12.5 inch HD (1366 x 768) Cấu hình 3: Giá 17.500.000đ Core i7 8650U / RAM 8GB / SSD 256GB / 12.5 inch HD (1366 x 768) - Option màn hình độ phân giải FHD 1920 x 1080 + 500k Đánh giá thiết kế cao cấp của laptop Dell latitude 7290 Intel Core i5 8th Gen i5-8350U Quad-Core Processor 1.7GHz (3.6GHz With Turbo Boost) 512GB SSD Hard Drive & 8GB RAM Memory 1920x1080 FHD resolution Non-Touch with an integrated Webcam and an integrated graphics chip Wireless Wifi & Bluetooth, DVD Drive Claim up to $2200 when you trade in your laptop. Les Sites De Rencontres Musulmans Gratuit. Date Published 14 Jan 2020 Intel Core i5-8350U Intel UHD Graphics 620 Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS 256GB SSD 8GB DDR4 kg lbs Pros Very good input devices High contrast screen with comfortable viewing angles Easy to get inside and upgrade PWM-free across all brightness levels Supports super fast NVMe storage Backlit keyboard Battery life is on point Cons Core i7-8550U underperforms in raw benchmarks Heavy price tag Thermal management is terrible Gets warm on the surface under heavy load Mediocre color range Specs HDD/SSD 256GB SSD Slot 1x 2280 PCIe NVMe slot See photo RAM 8GB DDR4 OS Windows 10 Pro Body Material Aluminum Dimensions 326 x 234 x mm x x Weight kg lbs Ports and connectivity 1x USB Type-A Gen 1 5 Gbps 1x USB Type-A Gen 1 5 Gbps 1x USB Type-C Gen 2 10 Gbps HDMI Card Reader Ethernet LAN Gigabit Ethernet Wi-Fi 2x2 Bluetooth Audio jack combo audio / microphone jack Smart card reader Features Web camera HD 720p Microphone 3 multi array microphone Speakers Bang & Olufsen stereo speakers Optical drive Security Lock slot Spill-resistant keyboard with drain Ambient light sensor There are 9 laptops with the same specs, All brands sorted by price CommissionsEarned More HP EliteBook 840 G5 configurations - 75 laptops CommissionsEarned DISPLAY 1920 x 1080, IPS Name Innolux N140HCA-EAC Diagonal Pixel density ppi Brightness 265 cd/m2 sRGB 52% PWM frequency 25000 Hz Panel Type IPS Resolution 1920 x 1080 Becomes "Retina" from 22 inches 56 cm Contrast 13001 dE Color Checker PWM Rating acceptable Buy our Profiles Buy our profiles for Innolux N140HCA-EAC In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible. Office Work Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors. $ BUY NOW Design and Gaming This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65. $ BUY NOW Health-Guard Health-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation PWM and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced. $ BUY NOW HP EliteBook 840 G5 in-depth review Today we are going to take a look at a 14-inch member of HP's more exquisite business solutions. We are talking about the HP EliteBook 840 G5. You can look at it as the more expensive version of the ProBook 440 G5. For the higher price you get better build quality, more security features and more goodies like the touchscreen and face recognition system. This particular model comes with several 8th Gen Intel ULV chips to choose from. However, we picked a Core i7-8550U model equipped with a Radeon RX 540 2GB and 16 GB of RAM. Actually, the configuration is practically the same except the screen size obviously as the EliteBook 850 G5 we tested a couple of days ago. If you are into these type of devices, stay with us to see if the EliteBook 840 G5 suits you well enough. You can [...] Read the full review CPU Performance Intel Core i5-8350U 3D Rendering Results are from the Cinebench 20 CPU test the higher the score, the better GPU Performance Intel UHD Graphics 620 3DMark Fire Strike G Results are for the 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark the higher the score, the better LaptopMedia is a fully independent company. Almost all of the reviewed products come from online stores, instead of using review samples provided by the manufacturers. Our opinions are based on tests from our laboratory. Contact Us © LaptopMedia Ltd. - Some Rights Reserved. Laptops with Intel Core i5-8350U CommissionsEarned HP EliteBook 840 G5 ProcessorIntel Core i5-8350U VideoCardIntel UHD Graphics 620 RAM8GB RAM STORAGE512GB SSD Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS Detailed review Check Price Dell Latitude 7390 ProcessorIntel Core i5-8350U VideoCardIntel UHD Graphics 620 RAM8GB RAM STORAGE512GB SSD Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS Detailed review Check Price Dell Latitude 7390 ProcessorIntel Core i5-8350U VideoCardIntel UHD Graphics 620 RAM8GB RAM STORAGE256GB SSD Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS Detailed review Check Price Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 6 ProcessorIntel Core i5-8350U VideoCardIntel UHD Graphics 620 RAM8GB RAM STORAGE256GB SSD Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS Check Price View all results Reliable business partner. Today’s Latitude 7490 configuration packs a quad-core Core i5-8350U and conventional SATA storage, and it makes a few more cuts to deflate the cost a bit. Even so, this remains an impressive machine. How does this configuration stand up to its competitors?Back in April, we reviewed Dell’s latest 14-inch Latitude 7000 series machine, the Latitude 7490. Unsurprisingly, we found our test unit to be overall excellent in keeping with the trends of its forebears. While it’s true that the 7490 is primarily an iterative rather than revolutionary update—preserving the perennially-lauded magnesium casing, terrific keyboard, straightforward maintenance, and all-day battery life—this year’s revision also introduces a few other significant improvements. Apart from the obvious benefits bestowed by the quad-core Intel Kaby Lake Refresh CPUs, the touchpad has been greatly enhanced by the adoption of Windows Precision drivers, and the incorporation of Active Steering Antenna technology seems to have improved WLAN throughput and reliability to boot. Our previous review unit packed a Core i7 and one of Dell’s new embedded touch displays which are a pretty enticing alternative to the usual high-gloss touchscreens; today’s review unit dials back the CPU to a Core i5-8350U, reverts to a conventional FHD non-touch still matte display, and makes a few other minor changes. It retails currently for $1,709 directly from Dell, which is a few hundred bucks below the previous configuration. How does it stand up to fierce competitors from Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon and HP EliteBook 840 G5? Let’s dig into the data and find inch 169, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO503D D04YD_B140HAN, IPS, glossy noMainboardIntel Sunrise Point-LPStorageToshiba KSG60ZMV256G, 256 GB SoundcardRealtek ALC256 Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio ControllerConnections4 USB / Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections mm combo audio, Card Reader SDNetworkingIntel Ethernet Connection I219-LM 10/100/1000MBit/s, Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/, Bluetooth x width x depth in mm x 331 x = x x inBattery60 Wh, 7500 mAh Lithium-IonOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Pro 64 BitCameraWebcam 720pPrimary Camera 1 MPixAdditional featuresKeyboard Chiclet, Keyboard Light yes, 36 Months kg = oz / pounds, Power Supply 293 g = oz / poundsNote The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. The case design hasn’t changed much since our previous review unit, so we’ll refer you to that article for our full impressions. The sole difference with today’s configuration is the exchange of the carbon fiber lid which optionally lines the back of the embedded touch panel, which today’s unit lacks for a conventional magnesium lid that we recognize from the 7480. To summarize the rest of our impressions, the nearly fully magnesium construction is as sturdy as ever, with very little flex across the base unit even under direct pressure. The display lid, likewise, remains highly resistant to torsion, and the single central hinge is stiff enough to prevent the lid from unintended vibration—though it’s impossible to open without both hands. Gaps between parts are even and small. Our single complaint is merely an aesthetic one namely, the penchant of the soft-touch material covering the surfaces for collecting and preserving fingerprints and skin oils. Otherwise, the Latitude 7490 remains one of the best-constructed business laptops on the market today. Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 Dell Latitude 7490 HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Dell Latitude 7390 DIN A4 ❌331 mm / 13 inch mm / inch mm / inch lbs331 mm / 13 inch mm / inch mm / inch lbs326 mm / inch 234 mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch lbs305 mm / 12 inch 208 mm / inch mm / inch lbs297 mm / inch 210 mm / inch 1 mm / inch lbs Today’s test configuration lacks the Thunderbolt port and smart card reader of the Core i7 setup we reviewed back in April, but it’s otherwise identical. The Thunderbolt port has been exchanged instead for a conventional USB Type-C with DisplayPort. Port selection and placement, as before, is overall very good—with four total USB ports if the aforementioned Type-C port is included and plenty of space between the connections, all of which are located on the left and right the Latitude’s WLAN connectivity is the esteemed Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265, which is in fact the same adapter used by all competitors in our comparison field. The Latitude 7490 edges out its peers, however, possibly thanks to its adoption of Active Steering Antenna technology which we discussed in our previous review. You can read more about this particular technology WLAN adapterAbsent from today’s review unit is the touch fingerprint reader that occupied the right palmrest of the configuration we reviewed a couple of months ago—along with the NFC reader. As previously mentioned, the smart card reader is also missing. Finally, the IR camera for Windows Hello and facial recognition has been replaced by a conventional webcam. However, the typical Dell Client Command Suite and related software are still today’s unit trades the Thunderbolt port for a traditional USB Type-C/DisplayPort instead, Thunderbolt docks such as the Dell TB16 won’t work. Instead, users will need to opt for a USB or USB Type-C dock, which will still probably suffice for the average user. No accessories were included with our review system apart from a 65 W AC ease of the disassembly process has not changed since our last review; some eight captive Phillips Head screws secure the bottom cover, and nearly every replaceable component is available immediately beneath the panel. One gripe which still applies here is that the keyboard is among the hardest of all FRUs to replace since it’s beneath the motherboard—though this is unfortunately a pretty common trend these days thanks to the thinness of the devices populating even the business segment which are more and more akin to their consumer-grade counterparts as the years pass. There’s also an adhesive lining the LCD panel to help keep a consistent seal between the bezel and display that’s perilous during disassembly. In the event of a broken screen, technicians will need to take care to separate the bezel and panel surround without damaging anything. On the other hand, a notable advantage of the Latitude design is the incorporation of a plug-in DC jack rather than a conventional design in which it is soldered to the board. This makes DC jack replacements relatively painless, far easier than the full disassembly, board removal, and desolder/solder work that is required for a traditional broken DC US Latitude 7490 machines ship with a 3-year, on-site warranty after remote diagnosis from Dell. Various upgrades are available, including longer warranty terms and ProSupport/ProSupport Plus packages which include North American dedicated support specialists. Please see our Guarantees, Return policies and Warranties FAQ for country-specific Alongside Lenovo’s ThinkPad devices, Dell Latitude 5000 and 7000 laptops consistently possess some of the highest-rated keyboards around. The Latitude 7490 is no exception; its chiclet keys are well-spaced, the layout is familiar, and visibility is very good thanks to the black keys with white labels and a two-stage backlight that’s mostly even. Actuation force is medium and travel is lengthy—roughly 2 mm—with a good sense of feedback that supports fast typing without obtrusive noise. There is no “clatter” or unintended movement of keys. Overall, it’s an excellent keyboard and easily among the best we’ve reviewed. Touchpad Majorly improved over last generation’s version on the Latitude 7480 is the Alps touchpad, which now supports Microsoft Precision drivers for a notably more responsive and smooth operation. We had absolutely no problems during our time with the unit; pointer movement is quick and without delay. Although it's not quite as large as the touchpads from some competitors, we didn't struggle much with real estate for the typical gestures, which are reliably interpreted. The two buttons below the pad are quiet yet springy and comfortable for long-term use—far better than most any integrated Latitude 7490 retains the 1920x1080 resolution, but exchanges the embedded touch display of our previous unit with a conventional IPS, non-touch, matte panel. Subjectively, color seems vivid, contrast appears strong, and brightness is fairly good. Our measurements revealed an average brightness of 294 cd/m²—ever-so-slightly below that of the embedded touch model—and a very good contrast ratio of 13421. While the ThinkPad T480s and the EliteBook 840 G5 in our comparison table only achieve results slightly above these, the X1 Carbon absolutely blows them all away with an average brightness of 533 cd/m²—and the 840 G5 offers a superior FHD IPS display option with a mind-blowing 630 cd/m² result. While today’s screen is certainly nice enough, Dell should consider stepping up their options for the next model to stay in competition. Our display did exhibit some unfortunate backlight bleed in the lower left and right corners, as well as near the top right corner. As a whole, brightness distribution was fairly good, however, at 89%. Distribution of brightnessAUO503D D04YD_B140HANX-Rite i1Pro Basic 2Maximum cd/m² Nits Average 294 cd/m² Minimum cd/m²Brightness Distribution 89 %Center on Battery cd/m²Contrast 13421 Black cd/m²ΔE Color calibrated Greyscale sRGB Argyll 3D62% AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D sRGB Argyll 3D Display P3 Argyll 3DGamma Latitude 7490AUO503D D04YD_B140HAN, IPS, 1920x1080HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAAUO3B3D, IPS, 1920x1080Dell Latitude 7390LGD059B, IPS, 1920x1080Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00LP140QH2-SPB1, IPS, 2560x1440Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon IPS, 2560x1440Dell Latitude 7490AU Optronics AU0223D, IPS, 1920x1080Display-10%0%6%27%-6% Display P3 -10% 2% 9% 32% -5% sRGB -9% -2% 1%100 3% -8% AdobeRGB 1998 -10% 0% 9% 47% -5%Response Times-1%9%10%-25%-9% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * ?22, ? ?18, ? ? ? Response Time Black / White *32 ? ?18, ? ? ? 18-8% ? PWM FrequencyScreen5%7%1%36%-6%Brightness 34% -2%352 14%578 87% 6%Brightness294387 32%289 -2%343 17%533 81%305 4%Brightness Distribution8987 -2%86 -3%91 2%84 -6%87 -2%Black Level * -9% -35% -100% -65% -61%Contrast13421656 23%980 -27%765 -43%1521 13%887 -34%Colorchecker dE 2000 * 9% 52% 46% 69% 37%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * 6% 45% 31% 64% 47%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * -38% -3% 52% -110%Greyscale dE 2000 * 12% 49% 27%3 59%3 59% 107% 95% 104% 99% 103% 93%CCT7269 89%7811 83%6323 103%6452 101%6377 102%6962 93%Color Space Percent of AdobeRGB 1998 -8%63 2% 10% 43%58 -6%Color Space Percent of sRGB -9%95 -2%98 1%100 3%88 -9%Total Average Program / Settings-2% / 1%5% / 6%6% / 3%13% / 27%-7% / -7%* ... smaller is betterColor coverage is good at 97% of sRGB and 62% of AdobeRGB. This is roughly in line with the performance of HP’s EliteBook 840 G5, which just barely edges it out. However, the X1 Carbon runs away with the crown with a whopping 89% of AdobeRGB; the 7490 manages to cover just 64% of its displayed color of the box, the 7490’s color accuracy measurements were only average. Using CalMAN, we recorded an average ColorChecker DeltaE2000 of and a maximum of White, along wide a Greyscale DeltaE2000 average of The CCT Average of 7269 is also on the cool side, and our Total Gamma reading of is below the ideal value of A bit of calibration works wonders; afterwards, ColorChecker and Greyscale DeltaE average values dropped to just and respectively. Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 240 maximum ms. » 83 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices ms. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 636 maximum ms. » 60 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices ms. Screen Flickering / PWM Pulse-Width ModulationℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation PWM . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19210 minimum 5 - maximum 3846000 Hz was measured. The panel’s response times are a bit on the slow side, but PWM is not used for brightness management. Reflections are no problem for the Latitude 7480, which—thanks to its good brightness and contrast and anti-glare finish—is usable in all but the brightest of environments. Viewing angles of the IPS panel are one RAM slot is occupied in our review Latitude 7490 machines pack Kaby Lake Refresh 8th generation Intel CPUs ranging from dual-core Core i3 options up to quad-core Core i7 SoCs; all of the available chips operate under the constraints of 15 W TDP. While our previous review unit featured a Core i7 and 8 GB of dual-channel memory, today’s machine dials it back to an Intel Core i5-8350U and 8 GB of single-channel memory. As it often does with the recent Latitude models, LatencyMon reported some issues with DPC latencies—which could translate to issues streaming real-time audio and video. Performance is not diminished while operating unplugged, however; a second run of 3DMark 11 on battery power resulted in a score of 1771, which is close enough to our original score to dispel any R15While the 8th-generation Intel CPUs all tend to experience an initial short burst of performance before subsiding somewhat, the Intel Core i7 in our previous 7490 review unit still distances itself from the Core i5-8350U in our CPU tests—ahead by some 9% and 15% in the Cinebench R15 multi- and single-core tests, respectively. After the first few runs, average multi-core scores are closer to the 530 mark in our tests—again, below the less-consistent but still quite a bit higher roughly 570 we received over the long-term from the Core i7 model. Compared with the rest of its peers, the 7490 roughly matches the EliteBook 840 G5, but it’s well below both the larger ThinkPad T480s and Core i7-equipped X1 Carbon. The Core i7 model fares better here, so if more power is needed, we’d recommend springing for that one. Naturally, however, for most users, today’s specifications will be perfectly R15 CPU Single 64Bit153 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit569 Points Cinebench R15 OpenGL fps Cinebench R15 Ref. Match % Help 0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600TooltipCinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Whereas the Core i7 setup was close to the top in most of our general productivity benchmarks, today’s unit hovers around the middle of the pack, and ever-so-slightly below average for all notebooks powered by this CPU currently in our database. The PCMark 8 Work Score of 4906 is very good, while the PCMark 10 overall score of 3564 is slightly less impressive. The primary reason for today’s lower scores is probably the surrender of NVMe storage in favor of less expensive conventional SATA storage. At any rate, subjectively speaking, the machine seems nimble 8 Home Score Accelerated v2Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 4029 Points ∼61% +8%Average of class Office 1275 - 5686, n=15, last 2 years 4008 Points ∼60% +8%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 3886 Points ∼58% +4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3752 Points ∼56% +1%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 3723 Points ∼56% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 3652 Points ∼55% -2%Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 3063 - 3776, n=7 3566 Points ∼54% -4%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3503 Points ∼53% -6% Work Score Accelerated v2Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 5197 Points ∼73% +6%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 5155 Points ∼73% +5%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 4906 Points ∼69% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 4832 Points ∼68% -2%Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 4200 - 4906, n=6 4669 Points ∼66% -5%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4664 Points ∼66% -5%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4508 Points ∼63% -8%Average of class Office 1854 - 5610, n=13, last 2 years 3584 Points ∼50% -27%PCMark 10 ScoreAverage of class Office 2325 - 6418, n=107, last 2 years 4956 Points ∼49% +39%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 4053 Points ∼40% +14%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3905 Points ∼38% +10%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3602 Points ∼35% +1%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 3564 Points ∼35% Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 3004 - 3764, n=6 3534 Points ∼35% -1%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 3429 Points ∼34% -4%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 2429 Points ∼24% -32% EssentialsAverage of class Office 5095 - 11807, n=107, last 2 years 9397 Points ∼72% +27%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 8253 Points ∼64% +12%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 7929 Points ∼61% +7%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 7849 Points ∼60% +6%Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 6994 - 7995, n=5 7617 Points ∼59% +3%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 7376 Points ∼57% Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 7358 Points ∼57% 0%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 7139 Points ∼55% -3% ProductivityDell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 7142 Points ∼57% +25%Average of class Office 3053 - 9512, n=107, last 2 years 6981 Points ∼55% +22%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 6727 Points ∼53% +18%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 6521 Points ∼52% +14%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 5844 Points ∼46% +2%Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 5004 - 6238, n=5 5760 Points ∼46% +1%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 5739 Points ∼46% 0%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 5721 Points ∼45% PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 3723 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 4906 pointsPCMark 10 Score 3564 pointsHelp Predictably, storage speeds are well below those of the previous 7490, since this machine steps down to a Toshiba SATA drive from an NVMe Samsung PM961. Thanks to this, today’s unit is by far the lowest-scoring of all those in our field. Nevertheless as we alluded to above, once a certain level of performance is reached, most users aren’t likely to notice any difference. Plus, the replacement/upgrade procedure as we covered previously is simple—so if cost trumps top-end performance concerns, this would be a logical place to pull Latitude 7490Toshiba KSG60ZMV256GDell Latitude 7490Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPHP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAToshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256GDell Latitude 7390Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQAverage Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G AS SSD135%19%113%238%0% Copy Game MB/ Copy Program MB/ Copy ISO MB/ Score Total9472350 148%1232 30%2215 134%3529 273%947 0% Score Write357536 50%376 5%501 40%1801 404%357 0% Score Read3911242 218%603 54%1158 196%1168 199%391 0% Access Time Write * 46% 5% 43% 52% -0% Access Time Read * 64% -187% 44% 74% -0% 4K-64 33% 0% 22%1529 516%248 0% 4K-64 202% 31%932 195%876 177%316 0% 4K 45% 18% 45% 70% 0% 4K 81% 9% 85% 97% 0% Seq 212%339 15%830 181%1376 367%295 0% Seq 391%1611 231%1761 262%2396 393%486 0%* ... smaller is betterCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1 533 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1 MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1 206 MB/s CDM 5 Read Seq MB/s CDM 5 Write Seq MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K MB/s Today’s Latitude not only dials back the CPU as discussed above, but it also downgrades the RAM configuration to single-channel—which does in fact affect the performance of integrated graphics. As a result, our scores are some 16% to 22% below those of the 7490 we reviewed in April, and near the bottom of the pack overall which the X1 Carbon dominates. Needless to say, this isn’t enough horsepower to run any modern games at even low settings—but the Latitude 7490 isn’t a gaming machine. If graphical performance is of any significant concern, we’d advise springing for the higher-end configurations with both Core i7 CPU and dual-channel memory if 111280x720 Performance GPUAverage of class Office 599 - 11538, n=122, last 2 years 5070 Points ∼4% +208%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1901 Points ∼2% +15%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 1144 - 3432, n=244 1749 Points ∼2% +6%Dell Latitude 7390Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 1697 Points ∼1% +3%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAIntel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1653 Points ∼1% 0%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U 1648 Points ∼1% Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1633 Points ∼1% -1%1280x720 Performance CombinedAverage of class Office 461 - 9720, n=122, last 2 years 3925 Points ∼13% +199%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1880 Points ∼6% +43%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 927 - 2505, n=244 1578 Points ∼5% +20%Dell Latitude 7390Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 1390 Points ∼5% +6%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U 1313 Points ∼4% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAIntel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1261 Points ∼4% -4%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1220 Points ∼4% -7%3DMark1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAverage of class Office 5681 - 46247, n=112, last 2 years 21387 Points ∼6% +169%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 10123 Points ∼3% +27%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 9730 Points ∼3% +22%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 6205 - 16400, n=225 9262 Points ∼2% +17%Dell Latitude 7390Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 8247 Points ∼2% +4%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAIntel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 8181 Points ∼2% +3%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U 7943 Points ∼2% Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 7658 Points ∼2% -4%1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Office 712 - 8114, n=121, last 2 years 3569 Points ∼4% +257%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1283 Points ∼1% +28%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 1163 Points ∼1% +16%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 557 - 2608, n=213 1161 Points ∼1% +16%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAIntel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1009 Points ∼1% +1%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U 1001 Points ∼1% Dell Latitude 7390Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 977 Points ∼1% -2%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 963 Points ∼1% -4%1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme GraphicsAverage of class Office 29235 - 96779, n=12, last 2 years 52849 Points ∼7% Dell Latitude 7390Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 44697 Points ∼6% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 26409 - 59483, n=71 42924 Points ∼6% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAIntel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 42507 Points ∼6% Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 37734 Points ∼5% 3DMark 11 Performance 1797 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 7414 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 934 pointsHelp BioShock Infinite1280x720 Very Low Preset sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 52 fps ∼10% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼8% -19%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 56 fps ∼11% +8%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼8% -14%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼11% +9%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 53 fps ∼10% +2%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - n=187 fps ∼11% +17%Average of class Office 23 - n=3, last 2 years fps ∼13% +28%1366x768 Medium Preset sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 35 fps ∼8% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 26 fps ∼6% -26%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 30 fps ∼7% -14%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼6% -19%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼8% +3%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 35 fps ∼8% 0%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - n=187 fps ∼7% -6%Average of class Office - n=3, last 2 years fps ∼10% +32%1366x768 High Preset sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 24 fps ∼6% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼5% -11%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 24 fps ∼6% 0%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼6% -2%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼7% +27%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 30 fps ∼7% +25%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - n=187 fps ∼7% +15%Average of class Office - n=3, last 2 years 49 fps ∼12% +104%1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 DDOF sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 8 fps ∼3% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼3% -9%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 8 fps ∼3% 0%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼3% -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼4% +30%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 10 fps ∼4% +25%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 17, n=176 fps ∼3% +15%Average of class Office last 2 years fps ∼12% +310%Metro Last Light1024x768 Low DX10 AF4x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 31 fps ∼16% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 41, n=5 fps ∼16% 0%1366x768 Medium DX10 AF4x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 23 fps ∼12% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 28, n=4 fps ∼11% -3%1366x768 High DX11 AF16x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 15 fps ∼8% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 13 - 16, n=3 fps ∼8% -2%1920x1080 Very High DX11 AF16x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 6 fps ∼3% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 6 - 8, n=3 fps ∼4% +11%Rise of the Tomb Raider1024x768 Lowest Preset sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 17 fps ∼3% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼4% +6%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼22% +551%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - n=82 fps ∼4% +26%1366x768 Medium Preset AF2x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 11 fps ∼3% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼3% -1%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼12% +348%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - n=62 13 fps ∼3% +18%1920x1080 High Preset AAFX AF4x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 6 fps ∼2% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼2% +5%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 32 fps ∼8% +433%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 32, n=42 fps ∼2% +21%As we’d expect from our previous tests, full stress sees an initial jump to max turbo frequencies of GHz and concomitant core temperature jumps to 98 °C, but several seconds later the machine relents and we instead witness drops to around the – GHz range, where it remains thereafter. GPU stress by itself, meanwhile, isn’t quite as challenging for the system; clock rates are fairly consistent within the 1000 – 1100 MHz range, and temperatures reach 88 °C. Combined stress results in temperatures quickly rocketing into the mid-90s C shortly followed by a drop in clock rates to GHz CPU and 900 MHz GPU. This is fairly common behavior for similarly-equipped machines. CPU Clock GHz GPU Clock MHz Average CPU Temperature °C Average GPU Temperature °C Prime95 Stress - - 78 - FurMark Stress - 1000 - 1100 - 88 Prime95 + FurMark Stress 900 76 76 The internal system fanThe Latitude 7490 never was a loud machine, and it’s even quieter with today’s less power-hungry configuration. By slim margins, it’s in fact the quietest machine in our field, topping out at just dBA and averaging under load a mere dBA—barely above the ambient noise measurement of dBA. Like all of its competitors, while idling, the fan rarely even engages; and even when it does, noise levels barely increase to a paltry dBA. We did not detect any coil whine from our Latitude 7490 review unit. Noise Level Idle / / dBALoad / dBA 30 dBsilent40 dBAaudible50 dBAloud min , med , max BK Precision 732A 15 cm distance environment noise dBAFan noise profileDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256GHP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256GDell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPNoise-5%-2%-5%-4%-3%off / environment * -2% -0% -2% -2% -0%Idle Minimum * -2% -0% -2% -2% -0%Idle Average * -2% -0% -2% -2% -0%Idle Maximum * -15% 2% -1% -13% -9%Load Average * -18% -5% -23% -17% -6%Load Maximum * 12% -6% 3% 13% -2%* ... smaller is betterThe cooling system is identical to that of the 7480Temperatures haven’t changed much since the Core i7 model, with load averages on top/bottom °C and °C, respectively within a degree C of the previous measurements—though room temperatures were also a degree higher during today’s measurements, so it’s really closer to °C or so of a drop. Idle values are actually higher, which might be an idiosyncrasy of firmware or something similar because no other logical explanation suffices. Here, we recorded values of °C and °C, well above room temperatures. Unfortunately, while stressed, most of the heat is concentrated near the rear center and right side of the device the left side while sitting upright, so lap-based use during any sort of significant load is likely to become uncomfortable in short order. °C113 °C105 F33 °C91 F °C101 °C104 °C88 F 30 °C86 °C87 °C82 F Maximum °C = 113 FAverage °C = 95 F °C92 °C125 °C119 °C85 F38 °C100 F41 °C106 °C83 F33 °C91 °C94 F Maximum °C = 125 FAverage °C = 100 F Power Supply max. °C = 99 F Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer± The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is °C / 95 F, compared to the average of °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.- The maximum temperature on the upper side is °C / 113 F, compared to the average of °C / 94 F, ranging from to °C for the class Office.- The bottom heats up to a maximum of °C / 125 F, compared to the average of °C / 98 F+ In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of °C / 85 F.+ The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of °C / F and are therefore cool to the touch. - The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was °C / 82 F °C / F. The two down-firing, bottom-mounted speakers in the Latitude 7490 can’t hold a candle to those of the older and thicker Latitude 7000 models such as the 7440 and 7450, but they’re still better that most other direct competitors. Volume is merely average at dB, but mids and highs are balanced and at least inoffensive in terms of their linearity. Bass, as always, is mostly absent. dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Latitude 7490Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Frequency diagram checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devicesDell Latitude 7490 audio analysis± speaker loudness is average but good dBBass 100 - 315 Hz± reduced bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median± linearity of mids is average delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only away from median± linearity of highs is average delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz± linearity of overall sound is average difference to medianCompared to same class» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 73% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 51%Compared to all devices tested» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 audio analysis+ speakers can play relatively loud dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median± linearity of mids is average 9% delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only away from median+ highs are linear 4% delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz± linearity of overall sound is average difference to medianCompared to same class» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 57% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 51%Compared to all devices tested» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Partially because of its lack of NVMe storage, the Latitude 7490 is an extremely efficient device while idling. We measured just W average, with min/max values of 2/ W. This is the lowest of any machine we’re comparing today. Perhaps even more impressive is the measured maximum of W—well below most other machines, and even nearly 5 W below that of its Core i7/NVMe-equipped Latitude 7490i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAi5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, Latitude 7390i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, Latitude 7490i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, Consumption-46%-26%-55%-69%-30%Idle Minimum * -60% -65% -55% -90% -55%Idle Average * -40% -26% -45% -89% -38%Idle Maximum * -67% -9% -77% -109% -33%Load Average * 6% -13% -26% -24%43 -12%Load Maximum * -69% -16% -72% -35% -13%* ... smaller is betterThe internal 60 Wh batteryWe recorded a battery runtime of 9 hours and 8 minutes in our standardized web surfing benchmark, which is slightly above competitors like the ThinkPad T480s and X1 Carbon, and well above the HP EliteBook 840 G5’s 7 hours and 27 minutes. The Latitude 7390 with its slightly smaller screen easily takes the cake here, however, with a terrific result of 11 hours and 4 Latitude 7490i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 WhHP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAi5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 WhDell Latitude 7390i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 WhLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 WhLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 WhDell Latitude 7490i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 WhBattery RuntimeWiFi -18%664 21%537 -2%519 -5%561 2%Pros+ durable and solid case construction + attractive, subdued, soft-touch exterior + good general system performance + terrific keyboard + greatly improved touchpad thanks to Windows Precision drivers + strong selection of ports and convenient layout + long battery life + excellent wi-fi performance and stability + easy maintenance + quiet operationCons- competitors offer superior display options - thermal design could be improved; warm while idling and under load - speakers are weak compared to older Latitude machines - combined system stress results in throttled performanceThe Dell Latitude 7490Once again, we come away from a Dell Latitude 7000 series machine thoroughly impressed. Along with Lenovo’s ThinkPads and HP’s EliteBooks, the Latitudes stand head and shoulders above the rest of the business competition. They’re thoughtfully designed, smartly updated, and carefully revised. While the 7490 remains a mere iterative update to the 7480 in every sense of the term, it truly leaves little to be desired. The case is sturdy, subdued, and attractive, the weight is manageable, the input devices are top-notch, performance is very good, battery life is lengthy, and it’s a quiet companion. The few areas of improvement we’d like to see are display options to match its competitors, improved thermal management, and better speakers. Once again, we come away from a Dell Latitude 7000 series machine thoroughly impressed. Today’s $1,709 Latitude 7490 absolutely deserves consideration by anyone in the market for a premium business less expensive configuration lacks the Core i7, NVMe storage, touchscreen, and some of the biometric and security features of April’s review unit—but it’s also only $1,709 as compared to over $2,000 for the previous model. Those who don’t require dual-channel memory or any of the previously listed omissions would find little to complain about in this setup. CPU performance is roughly between 10 and 15 percent below that of the Core i7-equipped unit, and GPU performance around 15 to 22 percent lower though this is also a factor of dual-channel memory in our i7 configuration. As such, we’d suggest that upgrading to that SKU only makes sense if top-end CPU and GPU performance is of the utmost importance. Alongside the X1 Carbon, T480s, EliteBook 840 G5, and Latitude 7390, the Latitude 7490 absolutely deserves consideration by anyone in the market for a premium business laptop. Dell Latitude 7490 - 06/21/2018 v6old Steve Schardein Connectivity73 / 80 → 91% Games Performance57 / 68 → 84% Application Performance91 / 92 → 99% Office - Weighted Average Pricecompare Steve Schardein - Tech Writer - 98 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012In grade school, my first computer—an Apple IIGS—started it all for me. Later, in the nineties, if I wasn’t repairing computers for family and friends, I was busy cooking up nifty Visual Basic projects and playing PC games like Command & Conquer and Heroes of Might and Magic. Soon, much of my free time was spent moderating popular gaming forums and covering the industry for various websites. All the while, I never stopped repairing computers, and in 2006, I started a technology consulting company in Louisville. Today, I am truly living my dream still a child at heart, ever-curious, constantly learning, and thankful to you, our readers. Steve Schardein, 2018-06-21 Update 2019-03- 9 The Intel Core i5-8350U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i5-7300U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8350U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 3,6 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory. Architecture Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before. Performance According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads. Graphics The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 Intel Gen is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M. Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP Power Consumption The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors 14nm+, the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between cTDP Down and 25 R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bitmin 346 avg 548 median 569 6% max 631 Points 03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595Tooltip Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bitmin 128 avg median 46% max 153 Points Cinebench - Cinebench CPU Multi 64 Bitmin avg median 6 8% max Points Cinebench - Cinebench CPU Single 64 Bitmin avg median 5% max Points Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single 32bitmin 5152 avg 5461 median 33% max 5769 points Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi 32bitmin 16222 avg 17931 median 17931 13% max 19640 points Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi 64bitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single 64bitwPrime - wPrime 1024m *min avg median 4% max s wPrime - wPrime 32m *min avg median 2% max s WinRAR - WinRAR 1960 avg 2961 median 2961 17% max 3962 points X264 HD Benchmark - x264 Pass 2min 34 avg median 14% max fps X264 HD Benchmark - x264 Pass 1min 145 avg median 36% max fps TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpentmin avg median 14% max GB/s TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofishmin avg median 13% max GB/s TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AESmin avg median 12% max GB/s Blender - Blender BMW27 CPU *3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPUmin 5852 avg 6131 median 5925 13% max 6617 Points Super Pi mod XS 1M - Super Pi mod XS 1M *min 10 avg median 2% max s Super Pi mod XS 2M - Super Pi mod XS 2M *min 23 avg median 1% max s Super Pi Mod XS 32M - Super Pi mod XS 32M *min 580 avg 637 median 637 3% max 694 s 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physicsmin 4349 avg 5995 median 6092 16% max 7023 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physicsmin 39950 avg 43226 median 43226 36% max 46502 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physicsmin 38261 avg 42913 median 42913 36% max 47565 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 51828 avg 52962 median 53024 45% max 54034 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physicsmin 5408 avg 6288 median 6155 16% max 7190 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physicsmin 7603 avg 8941 median 16% max 10362 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPUmin 2484 avg 2537 median 2537 13% max 2590 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3646 avg 4185 median 4225 44% max 4685 points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 11004 avg 13358 median 13605 15% max 15464 points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 4160 avg 4210 median 4210 60% max 4260 points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 12679 avg 12800 median 31% max 12920 points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreMozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 1017 avg 1193 median 1216 1% max 1289 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *min avg median 2% max ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 28223 avg 32497 median 31171 30% max 38722 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 164 avg median 42% max 203 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer VisionPCMark for Android - PCM f. Android StoragePCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher 11. 2200550 no ids found in url should be separated by "_" +0s ... 0s 1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Jun 2023 135512 +0200 + ... 3 composed specs + ... 4 did output specs +0s ... 5 getting avg benchmarks for device 9214 + ... 6 got single benchmarks 9214 + ... 7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 8 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 9 return log + ... Reviews for the Intel Core i5-8350U processor Acer Chromebook 715 Laptop ReviewThe Acer Chromebook 715 is perhaps the current pinnacle of Chromebooks. With a sleek and sturdy build, excellent keyboard, and powerful hardware, it is easily o...Intel Core i5-8350U Intel UHD Graphics 620 2 kg HP Chromebook x360 14 G1 Core i5-8350U, eMMC, FHD Convertible ReviewHP has equipped its new 14-inch Chromebook convertible with a powerful Intel Core i5-8350U processor, an IPS touchscreen display and a sizable battery that deli...Intel Core i5-8350U Intel UHD Graphics 620 kg HP Elite x2 1013 G3 i5-8350U, SSD, 3k 2-in-1 ReviewComplete redesign. Hewlett-Packard's Elite x2 1013 G3 is a 13-inch 2-in-1 equipped with a powerful quad-core CPU, two Thunderbolt 3 ports, a 32 3k display, an ...Intel Core i5-8350U Intel UHD Graphics 620 kg Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6 2018 i5-8350U, Full-HD Touch, 256GB Laptop ReviewThe better and cheaper X1. The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6 has joined its WQHD HDR and Core i7 equipped sibling in our offices for review. The G6 is the entry-...Intel Core i5-8350U Intel UHD Graphics 620 kg Fujitsu Stylistic Q738 i5-8350U, UHD620 Convertible ReviewFujitsu's flagship tablet, the Stylistic Q738, allegedly offers the best possible convertible experience. With business features, like a smart card reader and a...Intel Core i5-8350U Intel UHD Graphics 620 kgDell Latitude 7490 Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg Review » Dell Latitude 7490 i5-8350U, FHD Laptop Review Dell Latitude 7390 Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg Review » Dell Latitude 7390 i5-8350U, SSD 256 GB Laptop Review Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg Review » Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 i5-8350U Convertible Review Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg Review » Dell Latitude 5490 i5-8350U, FHD Laptop Review Dell Latitude 7490, i5-8350U Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg External Review » Dell Latitude 7490, i5-8350U Acer Chromebook 715 CB715-1WT-527F Intel UHD Graphics 620, 2 kg External Review » Acer Chromebook 715 CB715-1WT-527F HP Chromebook x360 14 G1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg External Review » HP Chromebook x360 14 G1 Dell Latitude 5424 Rugged AMD Radeon RX 540, kg External Review » Dell Latitude 5424 Rugged HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 4LT83AW Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg External Review » HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 4LT83AW HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg External Review » HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LE002CMH Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LE002CMH Fujitsu Stylistic Q738 Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg External Review » Fujitsu Stylistic Q738 Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KF0022US Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KF0022US Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L50011US Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L50011US Fujitsu Lifebook E558, i5-8350U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 2 kg External Review » Fujitsu Lifebook E558, i5-8350U Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg External Review » Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 Dell Latitude 7390 Intel UHD Graphics 620, kg External Review » Dell Latitude 7390 Select Your Region Acessar para acessar conteúdo restrito Usando a pesquisa Você pode pesquisar facilmente em todo o site de diversas maneiras. Nome comercial Core i9 Número do documento 123456 Nome de código Alder Lake Operadores especiais “Ice Lake”, Ice AND Lake, Ice OR Lake, Ice* Links rápidos Também é possível experimentar os links rápidos abaixo para ver resultados das pesquisas mais populares. Informações sobre produto Suporte Drivers e software Pesquisas recentes Acessar para acessar conteúdo restrito Busca avançada Pesquisar apenas em Título Descrição ID do conteúdo Sign in to access restricted content. A versão do navegador que você está usando não é recomendada para este a possibilidade de fazer a atualização para a última versão do seu navegador clicando em um dos links a seguir. Safari Chrome Edge Firefox Conheça os processadores Intel mais recentes e experimente o desempenho aprimorado Não é possível carregar as informações sobre preços no momento. Comparar produtos Intel Essenciais Preço recomendado para o cliente Especificações da CPU Frequência da Tecnologia Intel Turbo Boost Frequência baseada em processador Frequência de TDP Configurável - alto Frequência de TDP Configurável - baixo Informações complementares Opções integradas disponíveis Especificações de memória Tamanho máximo de memória de acordo com o tipo de memória Nº máximo de canais de memória Largura de banda máxima da memória Compatibilidade com memória ECC ‡ Gráficos de processador Gráficos do processador ‡ Frequência da base gráfica Máxima frequência dinâmica da placa gráfica Quantidade máxima de memória gráfica de vídeo Resolução máxima eDP - tela plana integrada‡ Tecnologia de Alta Definição Intel Clear Video Intel Clear Video Technology Nº de monitores aceitos ‡ Opções de expansão Configurações PCI Express ‡ 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 Nº máximo de linhas PCI Express Especificações de encapsulamento Configuração máxima da CPU Tecnologias avançadas Compatível com Intel Optane™ Memory ‡ Tecnologia Intel Speed Shift Tecnologia Intel Turbo Boost ‡ Tecnologia Hyper-Threading Intel ‡ Extensões do conjunto de instruções Intel Intel Intel AVX2 Tecnologia Intel My WiFi Tecnologia Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Tecnologias de monitoramento térmico Acesso de Memória Flexível Intel Tecnologia de proteção da identidade Intel Identity ‡ Tecnologia Intel de Resposta Inteligente Segurança e confiabilidade Elegibilidade Intel vPro ‡ Novas instruções Intel AES Intel Software Guard Extensions IntelSGX Intel Trusted Execution Technology ‡ Bit de desativação de execução ‡ Programa Intel da Plataforma de Imagem Estável SIPP Tecnologia de virtualização Intel VT-x ‡ Tecnologia de virtualização Intel para E/S dirigida VT-d ‡ Intel VT-x com Tabelas de páginas estendidas EPT ‡ Todas as informações fornecidas estão sujeitas a alterações a qualquer momento, sem aviso prévio. A Intel pode alterar o ciclo de vida da fabricação, as especificações e as descrições dos produtos a qualquer momento, sem aviso prévio. As informações aqui contidas são fornecidas "no estado em que se encontram" e a Intel não atribui qualquer declaração ou garantias relacionadas à precisão das informações, nem sobre os recursos dos produtos, disponibilidade, funcionalidade ou compatibilidade dos produtos listados. Para obter mais informações sobre os produtos ou sistemas, entre em contato com o fornecedor do sistema. As classificações da Intel são apenas para fins gerais, educacionais e de planejamento e consistem nos números ECCN Número de Classificação de Controle de Exportações e HTS Programa de Tarifas Harmonizadas. Quaisquer usos das classificações da Intel são sem os recursos da Intel e não devem ser interpretados como uma representação ou garantia relacionada ao ECCN ou HTS apropriado. Como exportadora e/ou importadora, sua empresa é responsável por determinar a classificação correta de sua transação. Consulte a Ficha técnica para obter definições formais de propriedades e recursos de produtos. ‡ Este recurso pode não estar disponível em todos os sistemas de computação. Verifique com o fornecedor do sistema para determinar se seu sistema oferece este recurso ou consulte as especificações de seu sistema motherboard, processador, chipset, alimentação, HDD, controle gráfico, memória, BIOS, drivers, monitor de máquina virtual [VMM], software de plataforma e/ou sistema operacional para saber sobre a compatibilidade do recurso. A funcionalidade, o desempenho e outros benefícios deste recurso podem variar, dependendo das configurações do sistema. Os números dos processadores Intel não são indicação de desempenho. Os números dos processadores diferenciam recursos dentro de cada família de processador, e não entre famílias diferentes de processadores. Consulte para obter mais detalhes. O TDP máximo e do sistema se baseiam nos piores casos. O TDP real pode ser inferior, se nem todas as E/Ss para chipsets forem utilizadas. SKUs "anunciados" ainda não estão disponíveis. Favor consultar a data de lançamento para a disponibilidade no mercado. Frequência máxima de turbo refere-se à frequência máxima do processador de núcleo único que pode ser atingida com a Tecnologia Intel Turbo Boost. Mais informações estão disponíveis no site Consulte para obter mais informações, incluindo detalhes sobre quais processadores são compatíveis com a Tecnologia Hyper-Threading Intel. Os processadores compatíveis com a computação de 64 bits na arquitetura Intel requerem BIOS habilitados para arquitetura Intel 64. Consulte para sistemas compatíveis com a Tecnologia de proteção da identidade Intel. A Tecnologia Intel de resposta inteligente requer um processador Intel Core™ exclusivo, um chipset habilitado, o software Tecnologia de armazenamento Intel Rapid e uma unidade híbrida disco rígido + unidade de estado sólido pequena configurada corretamente. Dependendo da configuração do sistema, os seus resultados podem variar. Para obter mais informações, entre em contato com o fabricante do seu sistema. Alguns produtos suportam as novas instruções AES com uma atualização da Configuração do processador, em particular, i7-2630QM/i7-2635QM, i7-2670QM/i7-2675QM, i5-2430M/i5-2435M, i5-2410M/i5-2415M. Favor entrar em contato com o OEM para o BIOS que inclui a mais recente atualização da Configuração do processador.

laptop core i5 8350u